The mission

Artificial intelligence is the most documented field of its time and one of the hardest to follow. The research is on preprint servers, the announcements on company blogs, the tools in newsletters, the roles on a hundred career sites, the events on ticketing platforms, and the news everywhere, repeated faster than it is checked. The information exists; it is scattered, uneven and rarely verified at the point where a reader meets it.

The result is a paradox: never has so much been published about AI, and never has it been harder to know what actually happened, who said it, and where.

AI.info was created to close that gap. Not another feed, but one place built around the questions people actually ask — what changed this week, whether a claim has a source, who is hiring for this, where the field meets next — where the paper, the lab that wrote it, the roles it is hiring for and the room where it will be presented sit on the same page, and where a story is not published until its quotation has been found and its source has been opened.

What is here today

counted now · every catalog is maintained continuously, never scraped once and left

The standard

Every story on the site goes through the same five stations, in this order, and comes back to the first when something is wrong.

The editorial pipeline: a primary source, a cross-check against at least two independent sources, a second adversarial reading, the editor's review, then publication — and a correction loop back to the source when something is wrong.The standard · the pipelineSourceprimary onlyCross-check≥ 2 independentSecond readingadversarialEditorial reviewnever automaticPublishedsource linkedCorrectionSource → Cross-check → Second reading → Editorial review → Published5 stations · one return

Primary sources

A story links the original — the press release, the paper, the filing — never the outlet that re-blogged it. Every story on the site carries its source.

Verification

Every fact is cross-checked against at least two independent sources, and every draft gets a second, adversarial reading before anyone sees it. A quotation that cannot be found is a failed story.

Editorial review

Nothing is published automatically. A draft stays unpublished until the editor passes it; a draft that fails verification is corrected first, or dropped.

Corrections

When something is wrong, the article is corrected and says so. Write in and it is looked at the same day.

What you will not find here

  • a paywall, or a story cut in half to sell the rest
  • sponsored placement: no tool, company or event is on the site because it paid to be
  • a story without its primary source linked
  • a tracking pixel in anything sent by email

The project

AI.info is a personal project. It did not begin with funding, a grant or a company. It began with a practical experience: following the field meant a dozen tabs open every morning, and none of them told you which of the headlines had a source behind it. What was missing was not information but a place that held it together, cross-referenced it and checked it.

Building that place proved more demanding than expected. Sources have to be found at the origin, names and figures reconciled across releases, companies told apart from their subsidiaries, events and roles kept current as they open and close. Every story, essay, company page and event on the site goes through the same process, and every one of them links to where it came from. The process is not perfect, but it is taken seriously, and it is what the site is for.

The aim over time is for AI.info to be a reference for anyone who works with or around artificial intelligence: readers, researchers, engineers, founders, recruiters, students and journalists. Not a feed, but a working record of the field, useful, verified and built one fact at a time.

Something wrong, missing, or yours and misrepresented? Write in. A correction is made in the article and noted there. Every list on the site can be followed without an account: the jobs feed, the events feed and the events calendar take the same filters as their pages.

Created by Gabriele Masetti

The sections