The Pulse
Google Keeps AI Overviews in School Search as Districts Push Back
Google will not give schools an option to disable AI Overviews while keeping traditional Search, leaving districts to consider workarounds or alternatives. Educators and parents say the feature could make it harder for students to assess so
AI.info Team · Written with AI · fact-checked ·
Google will not give schools an option to disable AI Overviews while keeping traditional Search. WIRED reports that Google announced on Tuesday that, starting next year, schools will have to block access to Search altogether to remove the feature.
Google says Search, its Gemini chatbot and Gemini Notebook will be off by default starting next year, and administrators can enable any or all of them. But the company considers AI Overviews and AI Mode inseparable from the traditional search experience. The decision has left schools weighing whether to keep using Google Search with its AI features or find ways to block them.
Educators raise concerns
Two weeks before WIRED’s report, an IT administrator for an elementary-middle school asked on Google’s support forums for a way to block AI Overviews. The administrator wrote, “Students need opportunities to navigate search results, examine sources, and draw their own conclusions rather than being handed an AI-generated synthesis before they've even started.” Google did not respond to the concern, according to WIRED.
Counterparts from three districts voiced similar frustration and pointed to work-arounds they were employing or considering to block AI Overviews. Dominique Johnson, part of the Oregon community group Lake Oswego Parents for Responsible Technology, said, “We were flabbergasted. This move makes things even more difficult for school districts that have determined AI is harmful to foundational learning.” Johnson also said, “Kids are already using these search-bar summaries to skip real effort, pulling instant math answers and letting AI write their essays. To make matters worse, these AI snapshots frequently make mistakes and output false facts, which younger students take as absolute truth.”
Los Angeles Unified says it is still reviewing the possible effects of Google’s announcement. Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia recently developed its own browser extension. Other workarounds include changing search URLs and using extensions to alter how Google results appear, though those methods could stop working if Google changes how it delivers search results.
Districts weigh alternatives
Some education technology experts say schools should leave Google Search or do more to teach students to question AI-generated answers. Stephen Aguilar, who coleads the University of Southern California’s Center for Generative AI and Society, said, “Under-resourced districts will grit their teeth and say, ‘We don’t have the capacity to dig in our heels and not use Google.’” He added, “A lot are likely going to accelerate plans they already have to teach students about this new digital literacy.”
Parent advocates also plan to urge districts to consider other options. Karolle Rabarison, a policy and communications strategist who helps lead Schools Beyond Screens in Washington, DC, said, “This move just continues a well-established pattern of big tech companies pushing products into classrooms. It’s not going to work anymore.” The privacy-focused search engine DuckDuckGo sees an opportunity to attract schools frustrated with Google. Its spokesperson, Allison Goodman, said, “I wouldn't expect to see a Google-style DuckDuckGo Classroom anytime soon, but ideally, we'll have special resources just for educators looking to make a switch.”
Google says it plans to launch Guided Learning for students in the coming months. The feature is intended to coach users to find information rather than provide an immediate answer. Chris Phillips, Google’s vice president for education, wrote in a company blog post, “We believe AI products should support ‘productive struggle’—enabling students to be actively challenged without getting so overwhelmed that they give up.”
Research cited by WIRED adds to the debate. A Stanford review of research as of a year earlier raised concerns that AI tools in schools may reduce opportunities for students to develop skills such as critical thinking. A survey conducted by Google found that three in four teenagers report using AI weekly, while only about half say they check its outputs for accuracy. A Washington University in St. Louis study found that only about 42 percent of AI Overviews could be fully verified using their citations.
Some districts may seek alternatives, while others may focus on teaching students to evaluate AI answers. For now, Google’s policy leaves schools that want to remove AI Overviews with a choice between using workarounds and blocking Search.