The Pulse
arXiv Caps Submitters at Two Papers a Month
arXiv began limiting each submitter to two papers per calendar month on October 1, 2026, as submissions reached 40,363 in September. The temporary cap applies across categories, counts rejected papers and sits alongside a three-active-submi
AI.info Team · Written with AI ·
On October 1, arXiv put a monthly ceiling on submissions: each submitter can send up to two papers, across all categories. The change followed a record 40,363 submissions in September, which generated almost 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. arXiv describes the limit as a temporary measure while it reviews practices for authors using increasingly capable AI tools and improves its moderation procedures.
September submissions reached 40,363
The repository’s figures show the increase over time: arXiv received 9,869 submissions in September 2016, 20,569 in September 2024 and 40,363 in September 2026. That latest monthly total was nearly double the figure from two years earlier. The September submissions also generated almost 9,000 support tickets, according to arXiv’s policy announcement.
arXiv says advanced AI tools are helping drive the growth by making some parts of research faster and easier. The organization permits authors to use AI in support of research when they disclose it and the work meets its standards for scholarly interest and contribution. It says many submissions now fall short of those requirements, but the announcement does not quantify what share of the increase is attributable to AI.
Moderators report thinner and AI-written papers
arXiv moderators are seeing more papers with narrow scope, more submissions that split one piece of work into several smaller papers, and a marked increase in dense, AI-written papers. The announcement says a small share of authors submit many low-quality papers, consuming a disproportionate amount of moderators’ time and delaying other work by days or weeks. Those are arXiv’s stated observations and rationale for the cap, not a finding that every high-volume or AI-assisted submission is poor quality.
“A relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time.”
Thomas Dietterich, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Oregon State University, and Chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council
Rejected papers still use a monthly slot
The limit counts submissions, not papers that are accepted or announced. Submit two papers in a month and the submitter must wait until the next month to send another, even if arXiv rejects them; the organization says submissions consume moderator time either way. The cap applies across categories, so sending papers to different subject areas does not create separate allowances.
A separate limit, in place since 2024, restricts submitters to three active submissions at a time. Papers carried over from an earlier month do not count against the new month’s allowance, though they still count toward that active-submission ceiling. A paper deleted before announcement does not count against either limit.
Co-authors do not use one another’s monthly allowances: the limit applies to the person submitting the paper. arXiv advises researchers with a backlog or a conference deadline to plan submissions around both limits and coordinate who submits each paper.
arXiv calls the cap a stopgap
The policy does not distinguish between submissions based on an author’s record; it sets the same monthly maximum across submitters and categories. arXiv says it will monitor the effects on authors, readers and the repository, and modify the policy as needed. For now, the rules are two submissions per calendar month and three active submissions at a time.