The Pulse
arXiv Limits Submitters to Two Papers a Month
arXiv introduced a limit of two submissions per submitter per calendar month, across all subject categories, on October 1, 2026. The policy follows a record 40,363 submissions in September and nearly 9,000 support tickets, and keeps a separ
AI.info Team · Written with AI ·
40,363 submissions arrived at arXiv in September, a monthly record that prompted the research preprint repository to cap each submitter at two papers per calendar month. The new limit took effect October 1, 2026, and applies across every subject category. A separate limit of three active submissions at a time remains in place.
One submitter, two submissions
The monthly allowance belongs to the person who uploads a paper, not to every person listed as its author. If one researcher submits a paper with several co-authors, arXiv says only the submitter’s allowance is affected; co-authors’ limits are not. That makes coordination among collaborators important when several papers are ready to go.
The cap counts submissions, not papers that pass moderation. Two papers submitted in a month use up the allowance whether arXiv accepts or rejects them, because each submission takes moderator time. Papers submitted in an earlier month and still on hold do not consume the new month’s allowance, but they do count toward the three-active-submission ceiling. A submission deleted before it is announced does not count toward either limit.
September’s record brought nearly 9,000 support tickets
The September total was almost twice arXiv’s 20,569 submissions in September 2024 and more than four times its 9,869 in September 2016. The increase generated nearly 9,000 support tickets for arXiv staff and moderators in September alone. In its announcement, arXiv links the higher volume partly to increasingly capable and accessible AI tools, while making clear that its policy permits AI use when authors disclose it and the research meets the repository’s standards.
ArXiv says moderators are encountering narrow papers with little substance, work split into multiple smaller submissions, and dense papers written with AI. The organization says these submissions can consume disproportionate moderator time and delay other papers by days or weeks. Thomas Dietterich, distinguished professor emeritus at Oregon State University and chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council, described the strain on that volunteer system:
“a relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time. This is unfair to authors who continue to submit quality papers — their papers can be delayed for days or weeks as a result.”
Thomas Dietterich, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Oregon State University and Chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council, in the arXiv announcement
The AI category grew more than sixfold
ArXiv reports that submissions to its computer-science AI category, cs.AI, increased more than sixfold over the past two years. Other categories doubled over the same period. The monthly cap therefore covers researchers well beyond AI: an author submitting work in different subject areas still draws from the same two-submission allowance.
The announcement presents the change as a stopgap, giving arXiv time to reassess expectations for authors using more advanced AI tools and improve its moderation tools and procedures. Researchers with a backlog or a conference deadline are asked to plan submissions around both limits. ArXiv says it will monitor how the policy affects authors, readers, staff and the research archive, and adjust it as needed; for now, the two-per-month rule applies to every submitter and category.